Respiratory Trials·org

Cardiology in critical care · Mechanical support in cardiogenic shock

ECMO-CS randomised trial

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Therapy of Cardiogenic Shock

ECMO-CS trial design and results
Design Multicentre randomised clinical trial
Treatment Immediate veno-arterial ECMO
Control Early conservative strategy permitting downstream ECMO
Population 117 analysed patients with rapidly deteriorating or severe cardiogenic shock
Follow-up 30 days
Primary endpoint Composite of death from any cause, resuscitated circulatory arrest, and another mechanical circulatory support device at 30 days
Result 58 patients were randomised to immediate veno-arterial ECMO and 59 to no immediate ECMO. Immediate implementation did not improve clinical outcomes compared with the conservative strategy.
Secondary endpoints All-cause mortality, serious adverse events

Immediate implementation of VA-ECMO in patients with rapidly deteriorating or severe cardiogenic shock did not improve clinical outcomes compared with an early conservative strategy that permitted downstream use of VA-ECMO.

The trial authors, in the published abstract

How it has aged

Structurally identical to EOLIA in respiratory failure: immediate versus rescue deployment, with crossover permitted. It tests timing rather than the therapy itself, and finds no advantage to going early.

Publications

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Therapy of Cardiogenic Shock: Results of the ECMO-CS Randomized Clinical Trial

Ostadal P, Rokyta R, Karasek J, et al. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Therapy of Cardiogenic Shock: Results of the ECMO-CS Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation 2023 Feb 7;147(6):454-464.

  • No improvement in the composite outcome with immediate ECMO
  • Conservative arm permitted downstream ECMO use