Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
EOLIA trial design and results
Design
Randomised controlled trial, stopped early for futility
Treatment
Immediate veno-venous ECMO
Control
Conventional mechanical ventilation with ECMO available as rescue
Population
249 patients with very severe ARDS
Follow-up
60 days
Primary endpoint
Death at 60 days
Result
Death at 60 days in 44 of 124 (35%) with ECMO versus 57 of 125 (46%) with conventional ventilation — relative risk 0.76 (95% CI 0.55 to 1.04, p=0.09). Crossover to rescue ECMO occurred in 35 control patients (28%) a mean of 6.5 days after randomisation, and 20 of those (57%) died. Bleeding events requiring transfusion were more frequent with ECMO.
Among patients with very severe ARDS, 60-day mortality was not significantly lower with ECMO than with a strategy of conventional mechanical ventilation that included ECMO as rescue therapy.
The trial authors, in the published abstract
How it has aged
A negative trial that is widely read as supporting ECMO, and the reason is the 28% crossover: the control arm was not really 'no ECMO' but 'ECMO later if needed', and 57% of those crossing over died. It tests timing, not the therapy. CESAR asked a related question about referral to an ECMO centre.
Publications
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Combes A, Hajage D, Capellier G, et al. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. N Engl J Med 2018 May 24;378(21):1965-1975.
60-day mortality 35% with ECMO versus 46% with conventional ventilation, not statistically significant
28% of the control group crossed over to rescue ECMO, and 57% of those died