Palliative Care-Led Meetings for Families of Patients With Chronic Critical Illness
Carson 2016 trial design and results
Design
Multicentre randomised clinical trial
Treatment
Structured family meetings led by palliative care specialists
Control
Usual care family meetings
Population
365 family surrogate decision makers, mean age 51, 71% female; 312 completed the study
Follow-up
3 months
Primary endpoint
Anxiety and depression symptoms on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at 3 months
Result
At 3 months there was no significant difference in anxiety and depression symptoms between the groups, and post-traumatic stress symptoms were higher in the intervention group.
Secondary endpoints
Post-traumatic stress symptoms, discussion of prognosis, length of stay, mortality
Among families of patients with chronic critical illness, the use of palliative care-led informational and emotional support meetings compared with usual care did not reduce anxiety or depression symptoms and may have increased posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. These findings do not support routine or mandatory palliative care-led discussion of goals of care for all families of patients with chronic critical illness.
The trial authors, in the published abstract
How it has aged
An uncomfortable and important result: structured prognostic discussion, delivered by specialists who did not know the family, appears to have harmed rather than helped. Read with PARTNER, where the same support delivered by the treating team did better on communication — continuity may be the active ingredient.
Publications
Effect of Palliative Care-Led Meetings for Families of Patients With Chronic Critical Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Carson SS, Cox CE, Wallenstein S, et al. Effect of Palliative Care-Led Meetings for Families of Patients With Chronic Critical Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2016 Jul 5;316(1):51-62.
No reduction in anxiety and depression at 3 months
Higher post-traumatic stress symptoms in the intervention group