Vasopressin versus Norepinephrine in Patients with Vasoplegic Shock after Cardiac Surgery
VANCS trial design and results
Design
Randomised controlled trial
Treatment
Vasopressin as first-line vasopressor
Control
Noradrenaline as first-line vasopressor
Population
300 patients infused with a study drug for vasoplegic shock after cardiac surgery: 149 vasopressin and 151 noradrenaline
Follow-up
Hospital discharge
Primary endpoint
Composite of mortality or severe complications within 30 days
Result
The primary outcome occurred in 32% of vasopressin patients versus 49% of noradrenaline patients.
Secondary endpoints
Atrial fibrillation, acute renal failure, mechanical ventilation time, ICU length of stay
The authors' results suggest that vasopressin can be used as a first-line vasopressor agent in postcardiac surgery vasoplegic shock and improves clinical outcomes.
The trial authors, in the published abstract
How it has aged
A striking result in a specific setting, and notably at odds with VASST, where vasopressin added to catecholamines in septic shock did nothing. The difference is first-line versus adjunctive use, and vasoplegia after bypass may simply be a different physiological problem.
Publications
Vasopressin versus Norepinephrine in Patients with Vasoplegic Shock after Cardiac Surgery: The VANCS Randomized Controlled Trial
Hajjar LA, Vincent JL, Barbosa Gomes Galas FR, et al. Vasopressin versus Norepinephrine in Patients with Vasoplegic Shock after Cardiac Surgery: The VANCS Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology 2017 Jan;126(1):85-93.
Primary composite outcome 32% with vasopressin versus 49% with noradrenaline
First-line rather than adjunctive use, unlike VASST