Respiratory Trials·org

Cardiology in critical care · Vasoplegia after cardiac surgery

VANCS randomised trial

Vasopressin versus Norepinephrine in Patients with Vasoplegic Shock after Cardiac Surgery

VANCS trial design and results
Design Randomised controlled trial
Treatment Vasopressin as first-line vasopressor
Control Noradrenaline as first-line vasopressor
Population 300 patients infused with a study drug for vasoplegic shock after cardiac surgery: 149 vasopressin and 151 noradrenaline
Follow-up Hospital discharge
Primary endpoint Composite of mortality or severe complications within 30 days
Result The primary outcome occurred in 32% of vasopressin patients versus 49% of noradrenaline patients.
Secondary endpoints Atrial fibrillation, acute renal failure, mechanical ventilation time, ICU length of stay

The authors' results suggest that vasopressin can be used as a first-line vasopressor agent in postcardiac surgery vasoplegic shock and improves clinical outcomes.

The trial authors, in the published abstract

How it has aged

A striking result in a specific setting, and notably at odds with VASST, where vasopressin added to catecholamines in septic shock did nothing. The difference is first-line versus adjunctive use, and vasoplegia after bypass may simply be a different physiological problem.

Publications

Vasopressin versus Norepinephrine in Patients with Vasoplegic Shock after Cardiac Surgery: The VANCS Randomized Controlled Trial

Hajjar LA, Vincent JL, Barbosa Gomes Galas FR, et al. Vasopressin versus Norepinephrine in Patients with Vasoplegic Shock after Cardiac Surgery: The VANCS Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology 2017 Jan;126(1):85-93.

  • Primary composite outcome 32% with vasopressin versus 49% with noradrenaline
  • First-line rather than adjunctive use, unlike VASST