16500 mechanically ventilated critically ill adults, median age 60, 38.2% female
Follow-up
90 days
Primary endpoint
All-cause mortality at 90 days
Result
Supplemental oxygen exposure was 29% lower in the conservative group. By 90 days 2908 of 8211 (35.4%) had died in the conservative group versus 2858 of 8183 (34.9%) with usual care — adjusted risk difference 0.7 percentage points (95% CI -0.7 to 2.0, p=0.28). No significant differences in ICU or hospital stay, or days alive and free of organ support.
Secondary endpoints
ICU and hospital length of stay, days alive and free of organ support
In adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation and supplemental oxygen in the ICU, minimizing oxygen exposure through conservative oxygen therapy did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality at 90 days.
The trial authors, in the published abstract
How it has aged
With 16500 patients it is decisively neutral, and it closes an argument that ICU-ROX and PILOT had already pushed the same way. Oxygen exposure fell by 29% without benefit or harm, which is a reasonable argument for conservative targets on grounds of resource use rather than outcome. Contrast LOCO2, where a much lower target did cause harm.
Publications
Conservative Oxygen Therapy in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Adult Patients: The UK-ROX Randomized Clinical Trial
Martin DS, Gould DW, Shahid T, et al. Conservative Oxygen Therapy in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Adult Patients: The UK-ROX Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2025 Aug 5;334(5):398-408.
No difference in 90-day mortality across 16500 patients
29% less supplemental oxygen used in the conservative arm
No difference in length of stay or organ support-free days