Early Active Mobilization during Mechanical Ventilation in the ICU
TEAM trial design and results
Design
Multicentre randomised controlled trial
Treatment
Increased early active mobilisation
Control
Usual level of mobilisation
Population
741 adults undergoing mechanical ventilation in intensive care
Follow-up
180 days
Primary endpoint
Days alive and out of hospital at 180 days
Result
Median days alive and out of hospital 143 (IQR 21 to 161) with early mobilisation versus 145 (IQR 51 to 164) with usual care — absolute difference -2.0 days (95% CI -10 to 6, p=0.62). Quality of life, activities of daily living, disability, cognitive and psychological function were similar. Adverse events potentially due to mobilisation occurred in 34 of 371 (9.2%) versus 15 of 370 (4.1%), p=0.005.
Secondary endpoints
Quality of life, activities of daily living, cognitive and psychological function, adverse events
Among adults undergoing mechanical ventilation in the ICU, an increase in early active mobilization did not result in a significantly greater number of days that patients were alive and out of the hospital than did the usual level of mobilization in the ICU. The intervention was associated with increased adverse events.
The trial authors, in the published abstract
How it has aged
The largest and most uncomfortable of the ICU rehabilitation trials. Combined with Moss 2016 and Morris 2016, the picture is consistent: more physiotherapy than usual care is not better, and beyond a point it causes arrhythmias, blood pressure disturbance and desaturation.
Publications
Early Active Mobilization during Mechanical Ventilation in the ICU
Hodgson CL, Bailey M, Bellomo R, et al. Early Active Mobilization during Mechanical Ventilation in the ICU. N Engl J Med 2022 Nov 10;387(19):1747-1758.
No difference in days alive and out of hospital at 180 days
No difference in quality of life, function or cognition
Mobilisation-related adverse events rose from 4.1% to 9.2%