Respiratory Trials·org

Mycobacterial disease · Treating rifampicin-resistant TB

TB-PRACTECAL randomised trial

A 24-Week, All-Oral Regimen for Rifampin-Resistant Tuberculosis

TB-PRACTECAL trial design and results
Design Open-label, randomised, controlled non-inferiority trial, terminated early
Treatment 24-week all-oral regimen of bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid and moxifloxacin (BPaLM)
Control Accepted standard care for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis
Population 301 patients in stage 2 with rifampicin-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis
Follow-up 72 weeks
Primary endpoint Composite unfavourable outcome of death, treatment failure, treatment discontinuation, loss to follow-up or recurrence
Result In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, 11% of the BPaLM group and 48% of the standard-care group had a primary-outcome event — risk difference -37 percentage points (96.6% CI -53 to -22). In the per-protocol analysis the figures were 4% and 12%. Recruitment was terminated early. The regimen also had a better safety profile. Grade 3 or higher and serious adverse events were less frequent with BPaLM than standard care, 19% versus 59%.
Secondary endpoints Safety, adverse events leading to discontinuation, culture conversion

In patients with rifampin-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis, a 24-week, all-oral regimen was noninferior to the accepted standard-care treatment, and it had a better safety profile.

The trial authors, in the published abstract

How it has aged

A 37 percentage point absolute difference is extraordinary, and reflects how poor standard care for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis was — 48% of the control group had an unfavourable outcome. Together with Nix-TB and ZeNix it rewrote WHO guidance and ended the era of injectable aminoglycosides.

Publications

A 24-Week, All-Oral Regimen for Rifampin-Resistant Tuberculosis

Nyang'wa BT, Berry C, Kazounis E, et al. A 24-Week, All-Oral Regimen for Rifampin-Resistant Tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 2022 Dec 22;387(25):2331-2343.

  • Unfavourable outcome 11% versus 48% with standard care
  • Better safety profile and all-oral administration
  • Recruitment terminated early