SWIFT-1 and SWIFT-2: Twice-Yearly Depemokimab in Severe Asthma
SWIFT trial design and results
Design
Two replicate phase 3A, randomised, placebo-controlled trials
Treatment
Depemokimab 100 mg subcutaneously at weeks 0 and 26, plus standard care
Control
Placebo plus standard care
Population
762 patients with severe asthma and an eosinophilic phenotype despite medium- or high-dose inhaled steroids
Inclusion criteria
Blood eosinophils 300 cells/microlitre or above in the previous 12 months, or 150 or above at screening, with a history of exacerbations.
Follow-up
52 weeks
Primary endpoint
Annualised rate of exacerbations at 52 weeks
Result
SWIFT-1: 0.46 per year (95% CI 0.36 to 0.58) versus 1.11 (0.86 to 1.43), rate ratio 0.42 (0.30 to 0.59), p<0.001. SWIFT-2: 0.56 (0.44 to 0.70) versus 1.08 (0.83 to 1.41), rate ratio 0.52 (0.36 to 0.73), p<0.001. Neither trial showed a significant difference in SGRQ score, so no inference was drawn on subsequent secondary endpoints.
Secondary endpoints
St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, symptom and control scores
Depemokimab reduced the annualized rate of exacerbations among patients with severe asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype.
The trial authors, in the published abstract
How it has aged
The interest is the dosing interval, not the mechanism: six-monthly anti-IL-5 achieves what monthly agents achieve, which changes adherence and clinic burden rather than efficacy. Quality of life did not improve, as with MATINEE in COPD — a recurring pattern in the anti-IL-5 trials worth being honest with patients about.
Publications
Twice-Yearly Depemokimab in Severe Asthma with an Eosinophilic Phenotype
Jackson DJ, Wechsler ME, Jackson DJ, et al. Twice-Yearly Depemokimab in Severe Asthma with an Eosinophilic Phenotype. N Engl J Med 2024 Dec 19;391(24):2337-2349.
58% and 48% reductions in annualised exacerbation rate across the two replicate trials
Twice-yearly dosing achieved this
No significant improvement in quality of life in either trial