Respiratory Trials·org

Asthma · Biologics for severe asthma

SWIFT

SWIFT-1 and SWIFT-2: Twice-Yearly Depemokimab in Severe Asthma

SWIFT trial design and results
Design Two replicate phase 3A, randomised, placebo-controlled trials
Treatment Depemokimab 100 mg subcutaneously at weeks 0 and 26, plus standard care
Control Placebo plus standard care
Population 762 patients with severe asthma and an eosinophilic phenotype despite medium- or high-dose inhaled steroids
Inclusion criteria Blood eosinophils 300 cells/microlitre or above in the previous 12 months, or 150 or above at screening, with a history of exacerbations.
Follow-up 52 weeks
Primary endpoint Annualised rate of exacerbations at 52 weeks
Result SWIFT-1: 0.46 per year (95% CI 0.36 to 0.58) versus 1.11 (0.86 to 1.43), rate ratio 0.42 (0.30 to 0.59), p<0.001. SWIFT-2: 0.56 (0.44 to 0.70) versus 1.08 (0.83 to 1.41), rate ratio 0.52 (0.36 to 0.73), p<0.001. Neither trial showed a significant difference in SGRQ score, so no inference was drawn on subsequent secondary endpoints.
Secondary endpoints St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, symptom and control scores

Depemokimab reduced the annualized rate of exacerbations among patients with severe asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype.

The trial authors, in the published abstract

How it has aged

The interest is the dosing interval, not the mechanism: six-monthly anti-IL-5 achieves what monthly agents achieve, which changes adherence and clinic burden rather than efficacy. Quality of life did not improve, as with MATINEE in COPD — a recurring pattern in the anti-IL-5 trials worth being honest with patients about.

Publications

Twice-Yearly Depemokimab in Severe Asthma with an Eosinophilic Phenotype

Jackson DJ, Wechsler ME, Jackson DJ, et al. Twice-Yearly Depemokimab in Severe Asthma with an Eosinophilic Phenotype. N Engl J Med 2024 Dec 19;391(24):2337-2349.

  • 58% and 48% reductions in annualised exacerbation rate across the two replicate trials
  • Twice-yearly dosing achieved this
  • No significant improvement in quality of life in either trial