Respiratory Trials·org

Procedures · How much pleural fluid to send

Swiderek 2010 diagnostic accuracy

Volume of pleural fluid required to diagnose malignancy

Swiderek 2010 trial design and results
Design Prospective comparative study
Treatment Pleural fluid volumes of 60 mL or greater
Control 10 mL sample
Population 121 patient encounters, of which 90 (74.4%) yielded a diagnosis of pleural malignancy
Follow-up Diagnostic study
Primary endpoint Sensitivity and negative predictive value for malignancy by fluid volume
Result For direct smear and cytospin, sensitivity and negative predictive value were significantly higher with 60 mL than with 10 mL (p=0.0058 and p=0.045). Volumes of 10 mL performed worse than larger volumes.
Secondary endpoints Yield by processing method, cell block sensitivity

The sensitivity for diagnosis of pleural malignancy is dependent on the pleural fluid volume extracted during thoracentesis. Volumes of 10 mL do not perform as well as larger volumes.

The trial authors, in the published abstract

How it has aged

A small practical study with an outsized effect on practice: the volume sent for cytology is a free variable that clinicians control, and getting it wrong costs a repeat procedure.

Publications

Prospective study to determine the volume of pleural fluid required to diagnose malignancy

Swiderek J, Morcos S, Donthireddy V, et al. Prospective study to determine the volume of pleural fluid required to diagnose malignancy. Chest 2010 Jan;137(1):68-73.

  • Higher sensitivity and negative predictive value with 60 mL than 10 mL
  • 10 mL samples underperform