Volume of pleural fluid required to diagnose malignancy
Swiderek 2010 trial design and results
Design
Prospective comparative study
Treatment
Pleural fluid volumes of 60 mL or greater
Control
10 mL sample
Population
121 patient encounters, of which 90 (74.4%) yielded a diagnosis of pleural malignancy
Follow-up
Diagnostic study
Primary endpoint
Sensitivity and negative predictive value for malignancy by fluid volume
Result
For direct smear and cytospin, sensitivity and negative predictive value were significantly higher with 60 mL than with 10 mL (p=0.0058 and p=0.045). Volumes of 10 mL performed worse than larger volumes.
Secondary endpoints
Yield by processing method, cell block sensitivity
The sensitivity for diagnosis of pleural malignancy is dependent on the pleural fluid volume extracted during thoracentesis. Volumes of 10 mL do not perform as well as larger volumes.
The trial authors, in the published abstract
How it has aged
A small practical study with an outsized effect on practice: the volume sent for cytology is a free variable that clinicians control, and getting it wrong costs a repeat procedure.
Publications
Prospective study to determine the volume of pleural fluid required to diagnose malignancy
Swiderek J, Morcos S, Donthireddy V, et al. Prospective study to determine the volume of pleural fluid required to diagnose malignancy. Chest 2010 Jan;137(1):68-73.
Higher sensitivity and negative predictive value with 60 mL than 10 mL