Respiratory Trials·org

Sedation, analgesia & delirium · Sedation interruption

SLEAP randomised trial

Daily sedation interruption in patients cared for with a sedation protocol

SLEAP trial design and results
Design Multicentre randomised controlled trial
Treatment Protocolised sedation plus daily sedation interruption
Control Protocolised sedation alone
Population 430 mechanically ventilated critically ill adults
Follow-up ICU stay
Primary endpoint Time to successful extubation
Result Median time to successful extubation was 7 days in both groups (IQR 4 to 13 versus 3 to 12; hazard ratio 1.08, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.35, p=0.52). ICU length of stay was also similar at a median of 10 days.
Secondary endpoints ICU and hospital length of stay, sedative doses, nurse workload, adverse events

For mechanically ventilated adults managed with protocolized sedation, the addition of daily sedation interruption did not reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation or ICU stay.

The trial authors, in the published abstract

How it has aged

Does not refute Kress 2000 so much as explain it: the benefit was never the interruption itself but the avoidance of deep continuous sedation. Once light sedation is the default, there is nothing left to interrupt. The same logic explains ROSE against ACURASYS.

Publications

Daily sedation interruption in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients cared for with a sedation protocol: a randomized controlled trial

Mehta S, Burry L, Cook D, et al. Daily sedation interruption in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients cared for with a sedation protocol: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2012 Nov 21;308(19):1985-92.

  • No difference in time to successful extubation
  • No difference in ICU length of stay
  • Both arms used protocolised sedation