Respiratory Trials·org

Mycobacterial disease · Shortening drug-susceptible TB treatment

REMoxTB randomised trial

Four-month moxifloxacin-based regimens for drug-sensitive tuberculosis

REMoxTB trial design and results
Design Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled non-inferiority trial
Treatment Four-month regimen with moxifloxacin replacing ethambutol (the trial's 'isoniazid group'), or moxifloxacin replacing isoniazid (its 'ethambutol group')
Control Standard six-month regimen
Population 1931 patients with drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis
Follow-up 18 months
Primary endpoint Favourable outcome, defined as culture-negative status at 18 months without relapse
Result In the per-protocol analysis a favourable outcome occurred in 85% of the group that kept isoniazid and replaced ethambutol, and 80% of the group that kept ethambutol and replaced isoniazid, versus 92% of controls — differences favouring control of 6.1 percentage points (97.5% CI 1.7 to 10.5) and 11.4 points (6.7 to 16.1). Both moxifloxacin regimens produced faster initial culture conversion. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events did not differ: 127 (19%), 111 (17%) and 123 (19%) respectively.
Secondary endpoints Time to culture negativity, relapse rate, adverse events

The two moxifloxacin-containing regimens produced a more rapid initial decline in bacterial load, as compared with the control group. However, noninferiority for these regimens was not shown, which indicates that shortening treatment to 4 months was not effective in this setting.

The trial authors, in the published abstract

How it has aged

The clearest demonstration in tuberculosis that early bactericidal activity does not predict cure. Faster culture conversion, more relapse. It is why Study 31/A5349 succeeded only by adding rifapentine, and why surrogate endpoints in tuberculosis are treated with such suspicion.

Publications

Four-month moxifloxacin-based regimens for drug-sensitive tuberculosis

Gillespie SH, Crook AM, McHugh TD, et al. Four-month moxifloxacin-based regimens for drug-sensitive tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 2014 Oct 23;371(17):1577-87.

  • Non-inferiority not shown for either four-month regimen
  • Faster initial decline in bacterial load despite worse final outcomes
  • 6 to 11 percentage points worse than standard therapy