Respiratory Trials·org

Pulmonary embolism · Imaging for pulmonary embolism

PIOPED diagnostic accuracy

Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis

PIOPED trial design and results
Design Prospective diagnostic accuracy study with angiographic reference standard
Treatment Ventilation-perfusion lung scanning
Control Pulmonary angiography as reference standard
Population 931 patients underwent scintigraphy and 755 underwent pulmonary angiography, of whom 251 (33%) had pulmonary embolism
Follow-up Diagnostic study with follow-up
Primary endpoint Sensitivity and specificity of ventilation-perfusion scanning
Result Almost all patients with pulmonary embolism had an abnormal scan, but so did most without it (sensitivity 98%, specificity 10%). Of 116 with high-probability scans and definitive angiograms, 102 (88%) had PE, but only a minority of those with PE had high-probability scans (sensitivity 41%, specificity 97%). Of 322 with intermediate-probability scans, 105 (33%) had PE. Around 12% of those with low-probability scans had PE.
Secondary endpoints Predictive value of scan categories combined with clinical assessment

Clinical assessment combined with the ventilation/perfusion scan established the diagnosis or exclusion of pulmonary embolism only for a minority of patients — those with clear and concordant clinical and ventilation/perfusion scan findings.

The trial authors, in the published abstract

How it has aged

The trial that taught a generation that a scan reported as low probability still carries a 12% chance of pulmonary embolism. It made pretest probability compulsory rather than optional, and everything since — YEARS, PEGeD, ADJUST-PE — builds on that lesson.

Publications

Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED)

Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA 1990 May 23-30;263(20):2753-9.

  • High-probability scans were 97% specific but only 41% sensitive
  • 12% of low-probability scans still had pulmonary embolism
  • Diagnosis established only when clinical assessment and scan agreed