Early versus late parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults
EPaNIC trial design and results
Design
Multicentre randomised controlled trial
Treatment
Late initiation of parenteral nutrition, after day 8
Control
Early initiation within 48 hours
Population
4640 critically ill adults
Follow-up
90 days
Primary endpoint
Duration of ICU dependency
Result
Patients in the late-initiation group had a relative increase of 6.3% in the likelihood of earlier discharge alive from the ICU (hazard ratio 1.06, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.13), with fewer infections and complications and faster recovery. Late initiation also shortened renal-replacement therapy by a median of 3 days (p=0.008), reduced the proportion ventilated beyond 2 days by 9.7% (p=0.006), and cut health-care costs by a mean of EUR 1,110.
Secondary endpoints
Infection rate, duration of ventilation, renal replacement therapy, healthcare costs
Late initiation of parenteral nutrition was associated with faster recovery and fewer complications, as compared with early initiation.
The trial authors, in the published abstract
How it has aged
Counter-intuitive and decisive: feeding critically ill patients aggressively early causes harm. It began a decade of trials — EDEN, PermiT, EFFORT Protein — all pointing the same way, that less nutrition early is better tolerated than more.
Publications
Early versus late parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults
Casaer MP, Mesotten D, Hermans G, et al. Early versus late parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med 2011 Aug 11;365(6):506-17.
Faster discharge alive from ICU with late initiation