Respiratory Trials·org

Bronchiectasis · Mucoactive treatment

CLEAR

Hypertonic Saline or Carbocisteine in Bronchiectasis

CLEAR trial design and results
Design Randomised factorial trial
Treatment Nebulised hypertonic saline, oral carbocisteine, or both
Control Neither treatment
Population 288 participants with bronchiectasis
Follow-up 52 weeks
Primary endpoint Mean number of adjudicated pulmonary exacerbations over 52 weeks
Result Exacerbations 0.76 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.95) with hypertonic saline versus 0.98 (0.78 to 1.19) without — adjusted difference -0.25 (-0.57 to 0.07, p=0.12). With carbocisteine 0.86 (0.66 to 1.06) versus 0.90 (0.70 to 1.09) without. No treatment interaction was found.
Secondary endpoints Quality of life, lung function, adverse events

In participants with bronchiectasis, neither hypertonic saline nor carbocisteine significantly reduced the mean incidence of pulmonary exacerbations over a period of 52 weeks.

The trial authors, in the published abstract

How it has aged

A properly conducted negative trial of two treatments in wide everyday use. It does not exclude symptomatic benefit for individual patients, which is the usual reason they are prescribed, but it removes exacerbation prevention as a justification.

Publications

Hypertonic Saline or Carbocisteine in Bronchiectasis

Bradley JM, O'Neill B, McAuley DF, et al. Hypertonic Saline or Carbocisteine in Bronchiectasis. N Engl J Med 2025 Oct 23;393(16):1565-1577.

  • No significant reduction in exacerbations with hypertonic saline
  • No significant reduction with carbocisteine
  • No interaction between the two treatments