Hypertonic Saline or Carbocisteine in Bronchiectasis
CLEAR trial design and results
Design
Randomised factorial trial
Treatment
Nebulised hypertonic saline, oral carbocisteine, or both
Control
Neither treatment
Population
288 participants with bronchiectasis
Follow-up
52 weeks
Primary endpoint
Mean number of adjudicated pulmonary exacerbations over 52 weeks
Result
Exacerbations 0.76 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.95) with hypertonic saline versus 0.98 (0.78 to 1.19) without — adjusted difference -0.25 (-0.57 to 0.07, p=0.12). With carbocisteine 0.86 (0.66 to 1.06) versus 0.90 (0.70 to 1.09) without. No treatment interaction was found.
Secondary endpoints
Quality of life, lung function, adverse events
In participants with bronchiectasis, neither hypertonic saline nor carbocisteine significantly reduced the mean incidence of pulmonary exacerbations over a period of 52 weeks.
The trial authors, in the published abstract
How it has aged
A properly conducted negative trial of two treatments in wide everyday use. It does not exclude symptomatic benefit for individual patients, which is the usual reason they are prescribed, but it removes exacerbation prevention as a justification.
Publications
Hypertonic Saline or Carbocisteine in Bronchiectasis
Bradley JM, O'Neill B, McAuley DF, et al. Hypertonic Saline or Carbocisteine in Bronchiectasis. N Engl J Med 2025 Oct 23;393(16):1565-1577.
No significant reduction in exacerbations with hypertonic saline