Respiratory Trials·org

Sepsis & septic shock · How much fluid

CLASSIC randomised trial

Restriction of Intravenous Fluid in ICU Patients with Septic Shock

CLASSIC trial design and results
Design International, multicentre randomised controlled trial
Treatment Restrictive intravenous fluid strategy
Control Standard intravenous fluid therapy
Population 1554 adults with septic shock in intensive care
Follow-up 90 days
Primary endpoint All-cause mortality at 90 days
Result 770 patients were assigned to restrictive fluids and 784 to standard fluids, with primary outcome data for 1545 (99.4%). The restrictive group received a median of about 1798 mL in the ICU, substantially less than standard care, with no difference in 90-day mortality. Serious adverse events occurred at least once in 221 of 751 (29.4%) with restrictive fluid and 238 of 772 (30.8%) with standard fluid.
Secondary endpoints Serious adverse events, days alive without life support, days alive out of hospital

Among adult patients with septic shock in the ICU, intravenous fluid restriction did not result in fewer deaths at 90 days than standard intravenous fluid therapy.

The trial authors, in the published abstract

How it has aged

Fluid restriction had become fashionable on physiological grounds, and this trial found the question is less consequential than the argument suggested. CLOVERS reached the same conclusion earlier in the illness, at the point of sepsis-induced hypotension.

Publications

Restriction of Intravenous Fluid in ICU Patients with Septic Shock

Meyhoff TS, Hjortrup PB, Wetterslev J, et al. Restriction of Intravenous Fluid in ICU Patients with Septic Shock. N Engl J Med 2022 Jun 30;386(26):2459-2470.

  • No difference in 90-day mortality
  • Clear separation in fluid volumes achieved between arms