Comparison of three methods of gradual withdrawal from ventilatory support
Brochard 1994 trial design and results
Design
Randomised trial in three intensive care units
Treatment
Pressure support ventilation weaning
Control
T-piece trials, or synchronised intermittent mandatory ventilation
Population
109 of 456 mechanically ventilated patients who met weaning criteria but could not sustain 2 hours of spontaneous breathing
Follow-up
21 days
Primary endpoint
Failure to separate from the ventilator by day 21
Result
Considering all causes of weaning failure, failures were fewer with pressure support: 23% versus 43% with T-piece and 42% with synchronised intermittent mandatory ventilation (p=0.05). Excluding patients whose weaning stopped for reasons unrelated to weaning, the difference widened to 8% versus 33% and 39% (p<0.025).
Secondary endpoints
Duration of weaning, reintubation within 48 hours
When all causes for weaning failure were considered, a lower number of failures was found with PSV than with the other two modes, with the difference just reaching the level of significance (23% for PSV, 43% for T piece, 42% for SIMV; p = 0.05).
The trial authors, in the published abstract
How it has aged
Historically important for killing SIMV as a weaning mode, though its pressure-support-versus-T-piece finding has not held up: TIP-EX found them equivalent for the breathing trial, and Jubran 2013 found unassisted breathing better in prolonged weaning. Note the primary result sat exactly at p=0.05.
Publications
Comparison of three methods of gradual withdrawal from ventilatory support during weaning from mechanical ventilation
Brochard L, Rauss A, Benito S, et al. Comparison of three methods of gradual withdrawal from ventilatory support during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994 Oct;150(4):896-903.
Fewer weaning failures with pressure support than T-piece or SIMV
Primary comparison reached significance only marginally, at p=0.05