Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure
BLUE protocol trial design and results
Design
Prospective multicentre diagnostic accuracy study
Treatment
Lung ultrasound using a defined protocol of scanning points and artefact profiles
Control
Final diagnosis established by the ICU team
Population
Patients admitted to intensive care with acute respiratory failure
Follow-up
Diagnostic study
Primary endpoint
Accuracy of ultrasound profiles for the cause of respiratory failure
Result
Predominant A lines with lung sliding indicated asthma or COPD with 89% sensitivity and 97% specificity. Multiple anterior diffuse B lines with lung sliding indicated pulmonary oedema, and other profiles distinguished pneumonia, pulmonary embolism and pneumothorax. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 90.5%.
Secondary endpoints
Accuracy for individual diagnoses, time to diagnosis
Lung ultrasound can help the clinician make a rapid diagnosis in patients with acute respiratory failure, thus meeting the priority objective of saving time.
The trial authors, in the published abstract
How it has aged
Turned lung ultrasound from a curiosity into a diagnostic discipline by naming reproducible artefact profiles rather than trying to image anatomy. Single-operator accuracy in expert hands is the standing caveat — the numbers are a ceiling, not an expectation.
Publications
Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: the BLUE protocol
Lichtenstein DA, Mezière GA. Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: the BLUE protocol. Chest 2008 Jul;134(1):117-25.
89% sensitivity and 97% specificity for asthma or COPD using the A-profile
Distinct profiles for pulmonary oedema, pneumonia, embolism and pneumothorax