Respiratory Trials·org

Pulmonary hypertension · Estimating pulmonary pressures non-invasively

Arcasoy 2003 diagnostic accuracy

Echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with advanced lung disease

Arcasoy 2003 trial design and results
Design Cohort study with right heart catheterisation as reference standard
Treatment Doppler echocardiographic estimate of systolic pulmonary artery pressure
Control Right heart catheterisation
Population 374 lung transplant candidates with advanced lung disease
Follow-up Diagnostic study
Primary endpoint Accuracy of echocardiographic pressure estimation against catheterisation
Result Pressure estimation was possible in only 166 patients (44%). Correlation with catheterisation was good (r=0.69, p<0.0001), but 52% of estimates were inaccurate by more than 10 mmHg and 48% of patients were misclassified as having pulmonary hypertension. Sensitivity 85%, specificity 55%, positive predictive value 52%, negative predictive value 87%.
Secondary endpoints Proportion in whom estimation was feasible, direction of misclassification

Despite a statistically significant correlation with directly measured values, estimation of systolic pulmonary artery pressure by echocardiography is frequently inaccurate in patients with advanced lung disease and leads to considerable overdiagnosis of pulmonary hypertension.

The trial authors, in the published abstract

How it has aged

A correlation of 0.69 sounds respectable and conceals a 52% positive predictive value. This is why pulmonary hypertension is not diagnosed on echocardiography, and why the negative predictive value of 87% is the number actually worth using — echo is a reasonable rule-out and a poor rule-in. Fisher 2009 found the same in a general PH population.

Publications

Echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with advanced lung disease

Arcasoy SM, Christie JD, Ferrari VA, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with advanced lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003 Mar 1;167(5):735-40.

  • Pressure estimation feasible in only 44% of patients
  • 52% of estimates inaccurate by more than 10 mmHg
  • 48% of patients misclassified, with considerable overdiagnosis