Three interventions in Cardiogenic Pulmonary Oedema
3CPO trial design and results
Design
Multicentre randomised controlled trial with three arms
Treatment
CPAP, or non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation
Control
Standard oxygen therapy
Population
1069 patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema, mean age 77.7 years, 56.9% women
Follow-up
30 days
Primary endpoint
7-day mortality for non-invasive ventilation versus standard oxygen therapy
Result
Seven-day mortality was 9.8% with standard oxygen and 9.5% with non-invasive ventilation (p=0.87). The combined endpoint of death or intubation within 7 days also did not differ. Non-invasive ventilation produced faster improvement in respiratory distress and metabolic disturbance.
Secondary endpoints
Death or intubation at 7 days, physiological improvement, 30-day mortality
In patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema, noninvasive ventilation induces a more rapid improvement in respiratory distress and metabolic disturbance than does standard oxygen therapy but has no effect on short-term mortality.
The trial authors, in the published abstract
How it has aged
A large, definitive trial that separates symptomatic benefit from survival benefit — both real findings, often conflated. Use non-invasive support in cardiogenic pulmonary oedema to relieve distress, and do not claim it reduces mortality.
Publications
Noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema
Gray A, Goodacre S, Newby DE, et al. Noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. N Engl J Med 2008 Jul 10;359(2):142-51.
No difference in 7-day mortality between standard oxygen and non-invasive ventilation
No difference in death or intubation at 7 days
Faster resolution of respiratory distress and acidosis with non-invasive ventilation